Oct 7, 2017
This week, Mad in America editor Emily Sheera Cutler presents the first in a series of interviews that examine the many important issues around forced treatment and cognitive liberty. The series will examine philosophical, theological, and sociological perspectives on coercive treatment.
In this first part, Emily interviews two well known and very respected academics and activists Bonnie Burstow and Nick Walker. Central to both Bonnie and Nick’s work is the concept of cognitive liberty or freedom and integrity of the mind. Early proponents of cognitive liberty have defined it as the right to control one’s own consciousness and be free from mind-altering drugs and technologies, as well as the right to use mind-enhancing drugs and technologies without facing legal consequences. Contemporary proponents of cognitive liberty have expanded the definition to include the right to experience and express each and every thought, feeling, state of mind, and belief as long as it does not harm anyone else. Both Bonnie and Nick describe cognitive liberty as the right to express oneself authentically. In this first episode, they get to the core of why so many human rights activists oppose forced treatment – it can interfere with people’s rights to be themselves.
In this episode we discuss:
Relevant Links
Bonnie Burstow’s articles for Mad in America
The Bonnie Burstow Scholarship in Antipsychiatry
Throw Away the Master’s Tools: Liberating Ourselves from the Pathology Paradigm by Nick Walker
Neuroqueer: An Introduction by Nick Walker
The social model of disability vs. the medical model of disability
To get in touch with us email: podcasts@madinamerica.com
© Mad in America 2017